QOS conflicting classifications

Unanswered Question
Feb 9th, 2007

If I have two conflicting match statement in two different class-map, which one would be examined first ? Example: match protocol citrix classified AF4 and match ip x.x.x.x classified AF3 ? What happens if the station x.x.x.x produces citrix traffic but for some reason, I want it to stay in AF3. Let's assume the policy-map would be based on CBWFQ bandwidth af4 remaining 40 % followed by bandwidth af4 remaining 40 % . Would the order of the statements in the policy-map determine the order in which the classifications are examined ? This example is a bit theoretical, it's just to understand the mechanisms behind.

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
awoog Fri, 02/09/2007 - 07:31

sorry ! af4 remaining 40% followed by af3 remaining 40%

Actions

This Discussion