04-16-2007 08:59 AM - edited 03-05-2019 03:29 PM
I created a VLAN 50 and 51 and gave them an IP address of 10.144.133.1 and 10.144.134.1, respectively. So far, I can ping each interface without any problem, but I am concerned that it could potentially cause a problem somewhere down the line. To give you a better idea of how this is setup, this 3550 is at our colo and connects to our main office via metro E. We have 2 remote offices that connect to the internet and to the main ofice via the colo. Everything internal is on the 10.x.x.x network. Anyone think this would cause a problem? Should I change the MAC on one of the VLANs, or let it go? The bonus question for extra credit is, why did the 2 VLANs (50 and 51), that were created within minutes of each other, get assigned the exact same MAC address?
Thanks in advance for any and all help with this!
PS: C3550 Software (C3550-IPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(25)SED
04-17-2007 04:36 AM
MAC address have only significance local to a VLAN so having the same MAC in two different VLANs isn't a problem. Catalyst 3550 have only one MAC address that's why the two vlan interfaces have the same MAC...
04-19-2007 08:14 AM
Thanks for clearing that up!
I just thought it was odd that they have the same MAC address. I would expect it to generate a MAC that isn't in use, or something. Do the 3550's all generate and use the same MAC address? That would be odd. I guess my next question is, how does the router decide what the MAC address of a newly created VLAN should be?
04-19-2007 09:00 AM
Hi Friend,
I doubt the 2 interfaces will have same mac address. Can you post the output of "sh interface vlan 50" and "sh interface vlan 51"?
Regards,
Ankur
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide