04-22-2007 11:25 AM - edited 03-03-2019 04:39 PM
Hi folks,
the topology is like this:
S - RP - MA - PIM R - Hosts
I've two questions about Auto-RP PIM mode:
1) from S (sources) to RP, and from RP to MA (mapping agent), I need to use 'sparse-dense' mode, or is enough 'sparse-mode' (without autorp listener)?
2) the best practice with Auto-RP is to use sparse mode with autorp listener, or sparse-dense mode with a "sink" RP for unknown mGroups?
Any advice will be appreciated
Regards
Andrea
04-22-2007 04:34 PM
1) Unless all the PIM routers are directly connected to the RP, you absolutely need sparse-dense mode (without autorp listener of course).
2)I would tend toward the first option, although the second one is also commonly seen. In all honesty, my personal preference is to use anycast RP.
Hope this helps,
04-22-2007 05:19 PM
Thanks for your answer,
, if I well understood, in a word, from S to RP, and from RP to MA, I've to use sparse-dense mode. Then, from MA to all PIM routers, I could use also sparse-mode with autorp listener .. correct?
Anycast RP? I normally use Anycast RP for RP redundancy, then use Auto-RP to propagate the information (rp-announce common-IP on RP, then rp-announce-filter on MA with the common-IP only).
Any advice will be appreciated
Regards
Andrea
04-22-2007 06:16 PM
Andrea,
This is not I was eluding to. If you use one startegy you should stick to it all the way.
As I stated, I would rather suggest Anycast RP as it allows you to configure the RP statically on all PIM routers and it offers redundancy at the same time.
Hope this helps,
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: