CSS Loadbalancing and Bypass - Question

Unanswered Question
May 1st, 2007

Is it possible to have two VIP's, one for a server farm, for HTTP and another VIP which catches all other traffic TCP/UDP on any IP. This bypass content needs to have a different next hop to the next hop used for HTTP traffic.



I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Gilles Dufour Wed, 05/02/2007 - 05:11


is it for a CSS or a CSM ?

It's possible with both, but if you want the appropriate config, I need to know the device.


alanwright1 Wed, 05/02/2007 - 05:48

Sorry Gilles, I thought the headline was clear enough, I guess not. This is for CSS115xx box.

Gilles Dufour Wed, 05/02/2007 - 07:44

sorry, I didn't check the title.

If you want to redirect some traffic to a specific next-hop, I would suggest to do it through an ACL.

So, in your case something like this

acl 1

clause 10 permit tcp any destination content

clause 20 bypass any any destination any prefer service_nexthop

clause 99 permit any any destination any

apply all



This Discussion