05-29-2007 07:55 AM - edited 03-05-2019 04:21 PM
Greetings, I have 3524 and 3548 Catalyst switches. I have performed some trunking on them like I have done many times before however when I perform a "sh vlan br" I notice that ports are not assigned to the vlan 100? is this normal? See config attachement
In this case I want port 1,2,3,4 to be in vlan 100 and if you notice the default vlan they do not show up there either.
Please advise
05-29-2007 08:34 AM
As you've noticed, only access ports are displayed ... trunked ports are not considered as part of the VLAN, since they actually contain traffic from several VLANs.
Good Luck
Scott
05-29-2007 08:38 AM
Am I missing something or was there a helpful tip in your comment someplace?
So this is fine or have I messed soemthing up or..?
05-29-2007 08:43 AM
It is completely fine. Trunked ports can be a part of any VLAN, it doesn't matter. It carries multiple VLANs anyway. It wont show trunk ports in the show vlan. If you want to see trunked ports, try:
#show interfaces trunk
(i think that's it)
-Chris
05-29-2007 09:11 AM
This is absilutely fine. There is no issues in the output. It will show up the same as this command will not list the trunk interfaces.
You can use " show interface x/y switchport " command or " show interface trunk " command to check the interface status.
HTH,
-amit singh
05-29-2007 09:40 AM
Thank you kindly folks.
I guess the light bulb finally turned on as it was a nice long weekend I enjoyed..
Makes sense as this time around i have "allowed" other vlans to the port as art of the trunking.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide