Redundant routing/switching question

Unanswered Question
Jun 6th, 2007

Hello experts,

The routing table of E3 shows the two routes to the 10.90.153.0/24 network,

via 172.23.31.53 and 172.23.31.24.

When I disconnect the link between THCC_1 and Test_1, the routing table on

E3 updates to show just the one route via

172.23.30.24, but I lose the ability to ping or traceroute from E3 to Test_1.

Test_2 pings and traces fine.

Is this a routing or spanning tree issue?

(or maybe there's a better way to do this redundancy?)

My diagram attached. All devices are 3560's.

Thanks much, Ric

Attachment: 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
anandramapathy Wed, 06/06/2007 - 07:26

What is the output When you do a

show ip route

on the Test_1 when the Link between THCC_1 & Test_1 is down.

Is there any reason that Test_1 is not runnign EIGRP

anandramapathy Wed, 06/06/2007 - 07:40

IF you do not want to run EIGRP on Test_1, then you have to put 2 static default Routes on it with different metrics - one pointing to 10.90.153.101 & 10.90.153.2

Then the return packets will flow back to E3 & you will be able to ping to Test_1 from E1

The same will be the case for Test_2

With regard to your design.

what are you connecting on various switches ?

ricschaaf Wed, 06/06/2007 - 07:59

Thanks.

I've turned on EIGRP on both Test_1 and Test_2.

It re-routes fine when I disconnect either (THCC_1 to Test_1) link or (THCC_2 to Test_2) link.

But now the problem is when I disconnect the link between Test_1 and Test_2, I lose connection to Test_2 because E3 thinks the route to it is still via THCC_1 and Test_1.

Test_1 and Test_2 will have client computers

connected to them. If I have one DHCP scope

for the 10.90.153.0/24 network, what should the router be set to? Test_1 or Test_2?

Actions

This Discussion