cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
424
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

NAT with PIX 520 with 6.3.5

gerd.steinhauer
Level 1
Level 1

We are facing a Problem with a special configuration:

nameif ethernet0 outside security0

nameif ethernet1 inside security100

access-list www_outside_inside permit tcp any host 192.168.117.223 eq www

access-list www_outside_inside permit tcp any host 192.168.117.225 eq www

access-list www_outside_inside permit tcp any host 192.168.117.225 eq https

access-list www_outside_inside permit tcp any host 192.168.117.223 eq https

ip address outside 192.168.117.220 255.255.255.0

ip address inside 10.16.133.100 255.255.252.0

static (inside,outside) 192.168.117.223 10.16.132.47 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside,outside) 192.168.117.225 10.16.132.47 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

is working fine with 6.3.3 but is rejected when typing in the second static nat-translation.

is this a bug or a feature?

4 Replies 4

Jon Marshall
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hi

I have just tried this on 6.3(5) and i get same error about duplicate translation. I'll see if i can find a 6.3(3) firewall but i might be out of luck.

What you could do

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.117.223 80 10.16.132.47 80

static (inside,outside) tcp 192.168.117.225 443 10.16.132.47 443

HTH

Jon

Hi Jon,

this is not a solution, we are in a transition phase where we move from provider-dependent to provider-independent addresses. the addresses you see, have been changed, they are not those on the customer site. what we do, is to nat the new addresses to unused addresses of the old space. we want the pix to translate the old address and the temporary address to the same host. after the dns-change took place, we are gooing to remove the nat-entries and move the pix to the new ip-sapce.

we do need the translation from two separate addresses to on and the same.

Gerd

Gerd

Sincere apologies, i didn't read your existing config closely enough.

Jon

r.sneekes
Level 1
Level 1

This is not a bug. What you are trying to do is not possible.

It's not possible to static nat 2 diffrent ip adressen to 1 outside adres.

It is possible to do port forwarding as stated above.

or use PAT but with PAT sessions can't be initiated from the outside.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card