06-18-2007 11:18 AM - edited 03-05-2019 04:48 PM
Hi, there's something I don't understand.... when you have a tunnel interface, and traceroute to the tunnel destination - why don't you get the hops inbetween the tunnel - the real hops that the tunnel is being formed over?
Thanks, LisaG
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-18-2007 11:36 AM
Becuase the ICMP packets are encapsulated (or enveloped) inside GRE packets and are never seen by the intermediate routers. Only when the tunnel destination is reached is the packet de-encapsulated.
If you want to trace the tunnel's path trace to the tunnel destination and not the tunnel's interface IP.
06-18-2007 11:45 AM
Lisa
If you want to put in a static route that will carry traffic through a GRE tunnel then the next hop in the static route should be the tunnel interface address of the remote router.
HTH
Rick
06-18-2007 11:36 AM
Becuase the ICMP packets are encapsulated (or enveloped) inside GRE packets and are never seen by the intermediate routers. Only when the tunnel destination is reached is the packet de-encapsulated.
If you want to trace the tunnel's path trace to the tunnel destination and not the tunnel's interface IP.
06-18-2007 11:41 AM
THANKS!
06-18-2007 11:42 AM
By the same token, if you want to put in a static route to through an IPSEC/GRE tunnel, is the next hop supposed to be the tunnel destination, the ipsec peer or the next hop in the physical path?
THanks, Lisa G
06-18-2007 11:45 AM
Lisa
If you want to put in a static route that will carry traffic through a GRE tunnel then the next hop in the static route should be the tunnel interface address of the remote router.
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide