cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
385
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Mobility group membership

lldemeyer
Level 1
Level 1

I have 4 WLC's deployed :

1. AnchorWLC - WLC4402 anchor in a DMZ for guest access

2. WLCA1 - WLC4402 on SiteA

3. WLCB1 - WLC2006 on SiteB

4. WLCB2 - WLC2006 on SiteB

SiteA & SiteB are geographically separated.

On all WLC's there is the same mobility group 'group1' with the following group members:

1.on AnchorWLC: group1 members:WLCA1,WLCB1,WLCB2

2.on WLCA1: group1 members: anchorWLC

3.on WLCB1: group1 members: WLCB2,anchorWLC

4.on WLCB2: group1 members:WLCB1,anchorWLC

As SiteA and SiteB are geographically separated I have not included internal(non-anchor) WLC's that are on siteA in the mobility group created on WLC's on SiteB and vice versa . The only WLC that has all controllers added to his mobility group is the AnchorWLC as guest access is needed from both siteA and siteB.

Is this a valid config(anayway it is working...) or is it recommended to have 2 different mobility groups, one for each site(A & B) and create 2 seperate mobility groups on the anchorWLC ?

1 Reply 1

smahbub
Level 6
Level 6

I would recommend going for two separate mobility groups. Even though it is working since it is geographically separated, its always better to have different mobility groups.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card