Sup-4 on Catalyst 4500 vs. Sup-32 PISA on Catalyst 6500

Unanswered Question
Aug 8th, 2007
User Badges:

Which Supervisor Module would have faster performance on Layer-3 routing? Supervisor-4 on a Catalyst 4506 or a Supervisor-32 PISA on a Catalyst 6506? I would like to know as I am planning an upgrade next year. This is for a medium-sized collapsed core/distribution-layer.


Thanks.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Edison Ortiz Tue, 08/14/2007 - 14:34
User Badges:
  • Super Bronze, 10000 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

The PFC3B card makes Sup32 PISA the clear winner.


There are a tons of stuff you can run in hardware with PISA that you would have to run in sofware with the SupIV.


See both Supervisor data sheets and you be the judge.


SupIV

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps4324/products_data_sheet0900aecd8035cf2b.html


Sup32-PISA

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_data_sheet0900aecd805a6b87.html


Jon Marshall Tue, 08/14/2007 - 17:06
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

Hi


I completely agree with Edison on this. As a further point if you are using this to do all your inter-vlan routing etc, the 6500 switch is a better investment in the long term. It is Cisco's premier switch and if you find you need more throughput you could upgrade your supervisor from a Sup32 to a Sup720.


Jon

hermanaccd Fri, 08/17/2007 - 10:34
User Badges:

Thank you everyone for your suggestions and feedback. I really appreciate it!

Actions

This Discussion