Route Patterns to Gateways lose Display Name?

Unanswered Question
Aug 16th, 2007

Im setting a green field with 2 offices.

Phone 2700 in PT "NYC"

Phone 2700 in PT "SFO"

I added a route pattern "10XXXX" in PT "NYC"

which goes to the SFO Route List.

The call goes through and presents the way I want it to, but i dont get the person calling name. Im calling IP phone to IP phone, going through the gateway.

Since I have overlapping DIDs, this is why I am using Site codes to dial in between and keep 4 digit extensions at each location.

Bad idea or should I move everyone to a 6 digit extension, and use CSS and PTs to dial between sites? (use translation patterns for incoming gateways to translate xxxx to xxxxxx)


I can see it coming through the gateway, but not showing up on the phone.

Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2

Standard = CCITT

Transfer Capability = Speech

Transfer Mode = Circuit

Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

Channel ID i = 0xA98397

Exclusive, Channel 23

Display i = 'Royal Oak'

Calling Party Number i = 0x0181, '202701'

Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown

Called Party Number i = 0x80, 'XXX2701'

Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown

21:37:54.283: ISDN Se0/0/1:23 Q931: RX <- CALL_


I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Paolo Bevilacqua Thu, 08/16/2007 - 13:56

Where are you sending the call ? If to telco, I don't think they are supposed to carry you calling names? Or, please xpalin how things are connected together.

Tommer Catlin Thu, 08/16/2007 - 14:07

Trying to preserve 4 digit intrasite dialing, and 6 digit intersite dialing.

So when calling 6 digits to a remote site, the Route Pattern sends it to the remote gateway.

Paolo Bevilacqua Thu, 08/16/2007 - 14:11

Sorry, I can't help you with the CCM setting to do this as I do not have expertise in that.

What I do not understand is if intrasite calls are supposed to go over POTS or not.


This Discussion