Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew
Cisco + Splunk: It’s a new day for your data. Learn more.
 
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Start a conversation
1524
Views
4
Helpful
1
Replies

G.729 Vs. G.711 over MPLS WAN

mdury
Level 1
Level 1

‎09-23-2007 12:30 PM - last edited on ‎03-25-2019 07:37 PM by Community Manager

We have a Hosted Call manager solution where we use G.729 codec globally over our MPLS netwrk. We have sufficient bandwtdth to support G.711 (at 80K per call). We would like to convert from G.729 to G.711 to eliminate the unneccessary use of DSPs for transcoding.

Is there any con to using G.711 over the wan if you have the bandwidth? Thanks

Labels:
0 Helpful
1 Reply 1

Rob Huffman
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

‎09-24-2007 06:09 AM

Hi Michael,

The use of g.711 over the WAN is of course what everybody would like to do if they had the requisite bandwidth :) This simplifies what you have noted, the need Transcoding enhanced conferencing etc etc. I can't think of any downside to this enviable design!

Hope this helps!

Rob

Customers Also Viewed These Support Documents