cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
349
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

split tunnel problem

techsitc10
Level 1
Level 1

Hi

I'm trying to enable split tunnelling but what appears to happen at the moment is that i can access the vpn.

at that point i still have external internet access.

When i actually connect to the server then i lose internet access.

i've attached my config file to see if someone can spot what is probably an obvious mistake.

thanks in advance

suzanne

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

access-list nonat permit ip

nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat

One other thing I noticed is that the vpn pool is part of the inside network. It is not advised to have this configuration. The vpn pool should have a completely different subnet. For example...

ip local pool george4vpn 192.168.20.200-192.168.20.230

access-list nonat permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat

Also, if you want split tunnel then acl 120 should read...

access-list 120 permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

Hope this helps. Please rate helpful posts.

View solution in original post

4 Replies 4

techsitc10
Level 1
Level 1

Hi

I think this isn't a split tunnel problem.

The issue is I can bring up a webpage but not access remote desktop or any other server services. When I look at the vpn stats on the remote connection there are none received although plenty are being sent.

Thanks

Suzanne

access-list nonat permit ip

nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat

One other thing I noticed is that the vpn pool is part of the inside network. It is not advised to have this configuration. The vpn pool should have a completely different subnet. For example...

ip local pool george4vpn 192.168.20.200-192.168.20.230

access-list nonat permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat

Also, if you want split tunnel then acl 120 should read...

access-list 120 permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0

Hope this helps. Please rate helpful posts.

Hi

Thanks for the help, and my apologies for taking so long to say thank you. It was all resolved last week.

Can I ask why you say the vpn pool should be on a completely different subnet? It works but I'm curious as to why this would be necessary.

Thanks

Suzanne

Suzanne, the pool needs to be unique so the firewall knows were to route the packets, you cannot have two of the identical subnets in existance within a network ~ bad things will happen.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card