ip nat mapping and route map statement

Unanswered Question


I've just been given a possible solution for mapping a range of ports.

ip nat inside source static interface dialer0 route-map STATICRANGE extendable

On the 12.4(4)T2 release for the (C870-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), this doesn't seem to work, noting is allowed to be added after the interface name.

Is this commend limited to certain ios versions?

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 2 (2 ratings)
lgijssel Wed, 10/03/2007 - 04:46

Looks like you have mistaken the correct syntax here.

Please verify with the IOS command reference for your release. I have done this as well but while that is for registered users only the link will be of little use to you. This is the representation of what i looked up:

ip nat inside source {list {access-list-number | access-list-name} | route-map name} {interface type number | pool name} [mapping-id map-id | overload | reversible | vrf name]

The | means "OR". Basically the command "ip nat inside source static" is followed either by the keyword "list" or the keyword "route-map". The command you have constructed seems incorrect to me.




This Discussion