Over the last couple of years I have followed closely the draft 802.11n standard and as a member of the IEEE Standards Association personally, I can tell you this has been one of the hardest debated standards in the history of the IEEE. There is a lot of money riding on this standard and who wins certain pieces of it. 802.11n unlike most other standards isn't really one standard but several. There are a certain number of minimum benchmarks that must be met by the standard but there are also several optional features that can be supported and still considered 802.11n. To fully understand 802.11n one must understand the history of 802.11 and the earlier standards shortcomings such as multipath distortion and contention rules. One must understand multipath channel distortion and how the 802.11 standard uses multipath to its advantage as well as how the new standard enforces new rules at the mac layer to fully see the benefit of moving to this standard. The standard would not greatly help in free space, but as we live in the real world, free space is not a real issue. In almost any environment we encounter surfaces that create some level of multipath distortion. The presence of this distortion is one way 802.11n increases performance. I have included a white paper for your review. This paper explains the standard and how the increased performances are achieved. Bear in mind that the standard is NOT final but should any major hardware issue be encountered the 1250 is modular and you could switch out the radios. Happy reading.

Attachment Keywords :