redistribute connected vs network command under address-family ipv4 vrf

Unanswered Question

Hi there,

On my implementation, PE-CE link, point to point /30, I configured under address-family redistributed connected.

There is an example I've seen using network command such as below:

!

address-family ipv4 vrf test

no auto-summary

no synchronization

redistribute static

network 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.252

!

Is there any major/minor different between those implementation?

Thanks in advance.

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
kewlnetguy Thu, 11/01/2007 - 03:46

Hi,

The differnce should be on the ease of extended implementation and the standard followed ( as you seem to be asking from the Service Provider end)

Next time you add another interface, you will have to specify another network command for the /30 IP subnet used for PE - CE link.

Cheers

Prince

shivlu jain Fri, 11/02/2007 - 09:24

Redistribute connected is used when when we want to redistribute the connected routes and with the help of network command we are using dynaic routing for this.

regards

shivlu

Actions

This Discussion