redistribute connected vs network command under address-family ipv4 vrf

Unanswered Question

Hi there,

On my implementation, PE-CE link, point to point /30, I configured under address-family redistributed connected.

There is an example I've seen using network command such as below:


address-family ipv4 vrf test

no auto-summary

no synchronization

redistribute static

network mask


Is there any major/minor different between those implementation?

Thanks in advance.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
kewlnetguy Thu, 11/01/2007 - 03:46
User Badges:


The differnce should be on the ease of extended implementation and the standard followed ( as you seem to be asking from the Service Provider end)

Next time you add another interface, you will have to specify another network command for the /30 IP subnet used for PE - CE link.



shivlu jain Fri, 11/02/2007 - 09:24
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

Redistribute connected is used when when we want to redistribute the connected routes and with the help of network command we are using dynaic routing for this.




This Discussion