redistribute connected vs network command under address-family ipv4 vrf

maher · ‎10-31-2007

Hi there,

On my implementation, PE-CE link, point to point /30, I configured under address-family redistributed connected.

There is an example I've seen using network command such as below:

!

address-family ipv4 vrf test

no auto-summary

no synchronization

redistribute static

network 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.252

!

Is there any major/minor different between those implementation?

Thanks in advance.

kewlnetguy · ‎11-01-2007

Hi,

The differnce should be on the ease of extended implementation and the standard followed ( as you seem to be asking from the Service Provider end)

Next time you add another interface, you will have to specify another network command for the /30 IP subnet used for PE - CE link.

Cheers

Prince

maher · ‎11-01-2007

Hi,

Aha! Sound logic mate! Thanks!

cheers!

william.caban · ‎11-02-2007

If this under the MPBGP there will also be a difference between the origin of the route. One will be reported (i) the other (?).

-W

shivlu jain · ‎11-02-2007

Redistribute connected is used when when we want to redistribute the connected routes and with the help of network command we are using dynaic routing for this.

regards

shivlu