10-31-2007 07:51 PM
Hi there,
On my implementation, PE-CE link, point to point /30, I configured under address-family redistributed connected.
There is an example I've seen using network command such as below:
!
address-family ipv4 vrf test
no auto-summary
no synchronization
redistribute static
network 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.252
!
Is there any major/minor different between those implementation?
Thanks in advance.
11-01-2007 03:46 AM
Hi,
The differnce should be on the ease of extended implementation and the standard followed ( as you seem to be asking from the Service Provider end)
Next time you add another interface, you will have to specify another network command for the /30 IP subnet used for PE - CE link.
Cheers
Prince
11-01-2007 05:19 PM
Hi,
Aha! Sound logic mate! Thanks!
cheers!
11-02-2007 09:12 AM
If this under the MPBGP there will also be a difference between the origin of the route. One will be reported (i) the other (?).
-W
11-02-2007 09:24 AM
Redistribute connected is used when when we want to redistribute the connected routes and with the help of network command we are using dynaic routing for this.
regards
shivlu
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: