Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew
Cisco + Splunk: It’s a new day for your data. Learn more.
 
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Start a conversation
334
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Performance of WS-C3560G-24 vs. WS-C3560G-48

johnnylingo
Level 5
Level 5

‎11-01-2007 02:34 PM - edited ‎03-03-2019 05:37 AM

We're in the process of replacing legacy switches in our wiring closets with a bunch of 3560 switches. The switches were already ordered several months ago by the previous manager. He ordered a mix of WS-C3560G-24PS-S and WS-C3560G-48TS-S models.

He also left a design, which called for using the WS-C3560G-24PS-S at the distribution layer and the WS-C3560G-48TS-S at the access layer (yes, no provisions for PoE at the access layer which I found to be silly, but that's another thing)

My question is, will this be a bottleneck? Will the C3560G-24 have a lower throughput as opposed to the 48 port model?

Labels:
0 Helpful
1 Reply 1

johnnylingo
Level 5
Level 5

‎11-01-2007 04:53 PM

Figured it out. Both have the same forwarding rate, so there shouldn't be a bottleneck in this design.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5528/prod_models_comparison.html

0 Helpful
Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Customers Also Viewed These Support Documents