11-07-2007 11:33 PM - edited 03-15-2019 07:07 AM
Hi,
I've a configuration with a 2811 with E1 as VG for CCM 4.3.
My trouble is that I've to apply a translation-profile on the incoming pots to change some called-id and:
- when the call arrive in END-BLOCK all is working fine BUT when the call arrive in OVERLAP-RECEVING the translation-profile is not matched and the call intercept an outgoing dial-peer voice.
Any help ?
Many thanks in advance
Luigi
....
....
....
!
!
voice translation-rule 111
rule 1 /^/ /0/ type unknown unknown
rule 2 /^/ /00/ type national national
rule 3 /^/ /000/ type international international
!
voice translation-rule 222
rule 1 /^6542286$/ /72710/
rule 2 /^65422861$/ /72710/
!
!
voice translation-profile InboundCallingPO
translate called 222
!
voice translation-profile InboundCallingParty
translate calling 111
!
!
!
application
service script4 ...
....
...
param operator 72711
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
...
...
...
!
interface BRI0/0/1
no ip address
isdn switch-type basic-net3
isdn overlap-receiving T302 5000
isdn point-to-point-setup
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
isdn static-tei 0
!
...
...
...
!
interface BRI0/2/1
no ip address
isdn switch-type basic-net3
isdn overlap-receiving T302 5000
isdn point-to-point-setup
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
isdn static-tei 0
!
...
...
...
!
!
voice-port 0/0/0
translation-profile incoming InboundCallingParty
echo-cancel coverage 32
compand-type a-law
playout-delay nominal 100
playout-delay mode fixed
cptone IT
timeouts interdigit 5
bearer-cap Speech
!
...
...
...
!
voice-port 0/2/1
translation-profile incoming InboundCallingParty
echo-cancel coverage 32
compand-type a-law
playout-delay nominal 100
playout-delay mode fixed
cptone IT
timeouts interdigit 5
bearer-cap Speech
!
!
!
dial-peer voice 1 pots
translation-profile incoming InboundCallingPO
incoming called-number 6542286T
direct-inward-dial
!
!
dial-peer voice 100 voip
preference 1
destination-pattern 6542286T
progress_ind setup enable 3
no modem passthrough
voice-class codec 99
voice-class h323 99
session target ipv4:10.168.1.2
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
fax rate disable
no vad
!
dial-peer voice 101 voip
preference 2
destination-pattern 6542286T
progress_ind setup enable 3
no modem passthrough
voice-class codec 99
voice-class h323 99
session target ipv4:10.168.1.1
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
fax rate disable
no vad
!
!
dial-peer voice 500 voip
description *** POSTO OPERATORE ***
service script4
destination-pattern 72710
session target ipv4:10.168.77.254
incoming called-number 72710
codec g711ulaw
!
dial-peer voice 110 voip
description Interno Pilot-Point PostOperatore
destination-pattern 72711
progress_ind setup enable 3
voice-class codec 99
session target ipv4:10.168.1.1
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
ip qos dscp cs5 media
!
dial-peer voice 120 voip
description Interno Pilot-Point PostOperatore
preference 10
destination-pattern 72711
progress_ind setup enable 3
voice-class codec 99
session target ipv4:10.168.1.2
dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
ip qos dscp cs5 media
!
dial-peer voice 200 pots
preference 1
destination-pattern 0T
progress_ind alert enable 8
port 0/0/0
!
...
...
...
!
dial-peer voice 205 pots
preference 6
destination-pattern 0T
progress_ind alert enable 8
port 0/1/1
.....
.....
.....
11-08-2007 02:14 AM
Luigi,
Do you have a problem with the calling or called number?
I have circuits with overlap and these work fine with translation for both calling and called.
Note unrelated to all that, try mentioning your customer the possibility to dial externally without the 0. It makes everything easier and intuitive, all my customers like it very much!
11-08-2007 03:07 AM
Hi and thanks for the reply,
my trouble is with called; i need that: 6542286 --> 72710
65422861 --> 72710
6542286XX --> 727XX ( translation made on CCM ).
the trouble is that when incoming call is in overlap, the translation on dial-peer voice 1 pots it's not matched and the call goes on dial-peer 100 and 101
Regards
Luigi
11-08-2007 05:53 AM
Hi Luigi,
The thing is that the "incoming called-number" under DP 1 has T at the end and will never match.
I suggest you do the following:
- remove translation from the DP
- remove translations from voice ports
- put the BRIs in trunkgroup:
voice port X/Y/Z
trunk-group ti
- apply translations to said trunkgroup:
trunk group ti
translation-profile incoming XXX
translation-profile outgoing YYY
- use said trunkgroup as destionation for outgoing DP:
dial-peer voice KKK pots
destination pattern 0T
trunkgroup ti
Note: with TI, you don't need:
progress_ind alert enable 8
Hope this helps, please rate post if it does!
11-08-2007 06:30 AM
Many thanks,
i'll try asap and, of course, I'll rate Your suggest.
Just a question: why the translation is not matched with overlap and it's matched in endblock ? or, better, i tryed with a cell phone ( dialing 06522286 ) and it works fine but, if I try with a telephone in overlap, the translation does not occour.
Best regards and many thanks
Luigi
11-08-2007 06:49 AM
Hi,
"incoming called-number" with T at the end works differently than "destination-pattern" - basically T and overlap are not supported.
11-08-2007 09:47 AM
Hi,
and if I insert another Dial-peer like written down ?
Dial-peer voice 2 pots
translation-profile incoming InboundCallingPO
incoming called-number 6542286
direct-inward-dial
11-08-2007 11:02 AM
Hi Luigi,
the thing is that with overlap you would need as many incoming DPs as many possible number lenght you possibly receive.
So it's a simple and better place to place the translation under voice port, or trunkgroup.
As a recognition to those providing answers, please rate all useful post using the scrollbox below!
11-08-2007 02:42 PM
Just tried.
The dial-peer is matched and the called number translated into 72710, but after that i get fast-busy.
Tomorrow i'll do some other check on outgoing dial-peer
11-08-2007 11:05 AM
Sorry to bother You,
just as other information:
some days ago, all voice translation-rule was applied to voice-port and we'd the trouble that all OVERLAP call was sent to PO.
For example, a fax received for the DN 6542286-97 was sent to 6542286 ( last 2 digit ignored ).
We solved moving the translation-profile incoming InboundCallingPO to DP 1.
regards
Luigi
11-08-2007 02:48 PM
Hi Luigi,
I have various installation with DID, overlap, and translation-rule on trunkgroup, and no problems. These all work with TI, Colt and Wind.
As long you have overlap-receiving, it should not be possible that digits are ignored.
Do your testing and let us know!
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: