QOS - CISCO Bug ?

Unanswered Question
Nov 9th, 2007

Hello Experts,

My,

CISCO Router: 3700 Series

Version: Version 12.3(20)

Sample Class-Map Configuration:

-------------------------------------

Class Map match-any Customer_Room

Match access-group 122

Detail: In the above Class Map Configuration i was NOT able to Match the "NAMED ACL" access-group.

Only the ACL with "ACL Index Number" can only be Matched.

Was this some CISCO IOS Bug ? (or) Have someone experienced this Problem before ?

But in the CISCO QOS config document, i am seeing the options to Match the "Named ACL".

Pls add your Comments. Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Guru Prasad R

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
royalblues Sat, 11/10/2007 - 00:17

Guru,

It definitely supports named access-lists and was able to use them without any problems. It could be a possibilty that you might have got the sytax wrong

This is what i tried

ip access-list extended exchange

permit ip host 172.16.150.5 any

permit ip host 172.20.61.60 any

class-map match-any exchange

match access-group name exchange

HTH

Narayan

guruprasadr Sun, 11/11/2007 - 20:54

HI Narayan,

Thanks for INFO. I am adding more details on my Configuration:

ip access-list extended QOS_Customer_Room

permit ip any host

permit ip host any

class-map match-any Customer_Room

match access-group name QOS_Customer_Room

My "Named ACL = QOS_Customer_Room" ==> when matching above Named ACL in Class-map, it doesn't Support.

Question:

---------------

Whether the Special Character's like "_" used in the Named ACL will not be recognised / supported by QOS Configuration ? ?

Please let me know your Comments / Feedback.

Best Regards,

Guru Prasad R

royalblues Sun, 11/11/2007 - 22:59

Guru,

That should not be a problem. Anyway can you let me know the exact IOS you are using.

Narayan

guruprasadr Mon, 11/12/2007 - 00:13

HI Narayan,

IOS : flash:c3745-is-mz.123-20.bin

Pls check and let me know. Thanks in Advance.

Best Regards,

Guru Prasad R

Actions

This Discussion