tagged and untagged members

Unanswered Question
Jan 7th, 2008

Hi all, can anyone tell me why we have the option to put ports into multiple vlan memberships, ie untagged member of vlan 1 but tagged member of vlan 2

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)

Take this example: Suppose that you have 3 PCs and on three seperate VLANs on switch-A, and have three servers on the corresponding VLANs on switch-B. Now if every PC on switch-A needs to speak to the corresponding server on switch-B, then you need to connect the two switches through ports that allow the three different VLANs (called trunk ports). Also, switch-A needs to tag any packet going out the trunk port so that switch-B knows to which VLAN this packet belongs (thus the use of tagging).

However, the two switches may agree that any untagged packet belongs to VLAN x lets say (keep in mind they have to agree on that). Keeping certain VLAN packets untagged is an option and may be useful in certain applications such as IP telephony when you have a PC connected to the IP phone where the phone understands tagged packets of VLAN Y and the PC on VLAN X doesn't understand the tagged packets.

jwadleigh Wed, 01/16/2008 - 13:04

Hi Carl -

Keep in mind, though, that a given trunk should only have one untagged vlan specified (refered to as the 'native vlan'). Several applications require that they traverse the native vlan because the app does not support/understand tagging.

Hope this helps!


This Discussion