royalblues Tue, 01/08/2008 - 03:18
User Badges:
  • Green, 3000 points or more

Do you have route for the subnet 10.209.19.65 on the router with IP 10.203.19.234?


can you post the routing table from both the routers


Narayan

korbenda11as Wed, 01/09/2008 - 22:39
User Badges:

yes i do have route...i did a traceroute from 10.203.19.234 to 10.203.19.65 and it stops at 6506 switch. I add a static route with vlan3 as my next hop and it works. Do I really need to add static routes on the switch? or can I just enable dynamic routing protocol (e.g. rip) on the switch? Pls. advice....thanks!

bvsnarayana03 Wed, 01/09/2008 - 23:31
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

From your post i understand u dont have route on core switch to the subnet to which host .65 is connected. So u nned to add a route.Running a protocol is entirely your choice.

korbenda11as Thu, 01/10/2008 - 18:26
User Badges:

thanks, can you give me a link for example configuration using dynamic protocol on a switch...

s.arunkumar Tue, 01/08/2008 - 03:25
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

check for any sort of filtering via access list...

check for route entry for subnet of 10.209.19.65..

Rick Morris Tue, 01/08/2008 - 06:04
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

This may be a stupid question, but is the interface up?


Can you ping the IP from the switch connected to that interface?


Can you do a traceroute to the IP and see where it dies at, then on the router where the .19.65 address is at do a debug icmp trace and capture the icmp to see if there is any ack back?

Actions

This Discussion