royalblues Tue, 01/08/2008 - 03:18
User Badges:
  • Green, 3000 points or more

Do you have route for the subnet on the router with IP

can you post the routing table from both the routers


korbenda11as Wed, 01/09/2008 - 22:39
User Badges:

yes i do have route...i did a traceroute from to and it stops at 6506 switch. I add a static route with vlan3 as my next hop and it works. Do I really need to add static routes on the switch? or can I just enable dynamic routing protocol (e.g. rip) on the switch? Pls. advice....thanks!

bvsnarayana03 Wed, 01/09/2008 - 23:31
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

From your post i understand u dont have route on core switch to the subnet to which host .65 is connected. So u nned to add a route.Running a protocol is entirely your choice.

korbenda11as Thu, 01/10/2008 - 18:26
User Badges:

thanks, can you give me a link for example configuration using dynamic protocol on a switch...

s.arunkumar Tue, 01/08/2008 - 03:25
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

check for any sort of filtering via access list...

check for route entry for subnet of

Rick Morris Tue, 01/08/2008 - 06:04
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

This may be a stupid question, but is the interface up?

Can you ping the IP from the switch connected to that interface?

Can you do a traceroute to the IP and see where it dies at, then on the router where the .19.65 address is at do a debug icmp trace and capture the icmp to see if there is any ack back?


This Discussion