Buy or Renew
Buy or Renew
Cisco + Splunk: It’s a new day for your data. Learn more.
 
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
Start a conversation
1719
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Etherchannel LACP Master in bundle ?

philipbarker
Level 1
Level 1

‎01-24-2008 08:13 AM - edited ‎03-05-2019 08:41 PM

Hi,

I am not understanding the concept of Master in the bundle with reference to Etherchannel and LACP.

I have configured two 3550 switches for Etherchannel LACP with a channel-group 1 and set my 3 ports on each end to 'active'. The Etherchannel is working, no problem. However, when I 'show etherchannel detail' every port in the etherchannel on both switches is 'Mstr In-Bund'. Can anyone help to explain why none of the ports are slaves ? I have tried manipulating port-priorities with 'lacp port-priority' but to no avail.

Regards,

Phil.

Labels:
0 Helpful
1 Reply 1

philipbarker
Level 1
Level 1

‎01-25-2008 08:59 AM

Hi,

I've had another thought about this and was wandering if the 'Mstr In-Bund' concept relates to when you have more than 8 ports configured in an Etherchannel and these ports go into a 'backup' mode for the instance were one of the first eight fails. Unfortunately I cannot test this as I don't have nine x-over cables.

Regards,

Phil.

0 Helpful
Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Customers Also Viewed These Support Documents
Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card