02-05-2008 10:44 AM
Hello
I have a cuestion regarding to the "port X" command into "service" definition.
Our real servers wait for data on tcp port (for example) 4443, 3444, 2444, etc, instead "original" ssl 443 port.
What is the aggregated load for the CSS with this configuration??
Do you recommend this PAT config like a better solution into the external Firewall instead on CSS??
Thanks in advance!!
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-05-2008 11:04 AM
the port command has no impact on performance.
It's safe to use.
Gilles.
02-05-2008 11:04 AM
the port command has no impact on performance.
It's safe to use.
Gilles.
02-05-2008 11:13 AM
Gilles,
Thanks for the quick response!!
We will probe this config, because we have some problems with the FW's PAT config.
Regards!!
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: