UC 500 BRI settings

Unanswered Question
Feb 9th, 2008

I've bin trying to get KPN multi ISDN2 linked together( 2 NT cases) under 1 number working on a UC500 with the follwing settings

interface BRI0/1/1

description ISDN-BRI CONNECTION TO KPN

no ip address

isdn switch-type basic-net3

isdn tei-negotiation first-call

isdn point-to-point-setup

isdn incoming-voice voice

isdn static-tei 0

trunk-group ISDN-LINES

the reply i get form the UC500 is

Feb 9 16:37:17.374: BRI0/1/1: In state F7, Received code unknown code

Feb 9 16:37:17.374: BRI0/1/1: In state F7, Received code Activation Indication with Priority to 8, Info 4 received

Feb 9 16:37:17.374: BRI0/1/1 : do nothing

I tryied several settings nothing works

What i'm i doing wrong?

Greetings Andy

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Paolo Bevilacqua Sat, 02/09/2008 - 09:07

hi, static-tei 0 should be right, but remove "isdn tei-negotiation"

Important, please upgrade to XW5 because previous versions are very buggy.

If still trouble, do "isdn test call int bri0/1/1 number 123" with debug isdn q921 and q931 active. Post output here.

hotrot_net Sat, 02/09/2008 - 09:16

XW5 already onboard en runnig

after making changes en putting to test i get this

UC520#isdn test call int BRI0/1/1 number 123

^

% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

Oops got this

Feb 9 17:19:27.158: ISDN BR0/1/1 **ERROR**: host_disconnect_ack: Unfound B-channel on Disconnect_Ack call id 0x800F

Paolo Bevilacqua Sat, 02/09/2008 - 10:22

Sorry there is no "number" in isdn test call. Get the debug isdn q931 now. Just try any call in or out. Place the two itnerface in trunk group to get everything easier.

hotrot_net Sat, 02/09/2008 - 10:34

inbound won't even work with the test call i get this outbound i get this

Feb 9 18:32:29.451: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: Applying typeplan for sw-type 0x1 is 0x0 0x0, Called num 90492540770

Feb 9 18:32:29.451: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x05

Bearer Capability i = 0x8890

Standard = CCITT

Transfer Capability = Unrestricted Digital

Transfer Mode = Circuit

Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

Channel ID i = 0x81

Preferred, B1

Called Party Number i = 0x80, '90492540770'

Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown

Sending Complete

Feb 9 18:32:29.883: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x85

Cause i = 0x8281 - Unallocated/unassigned number

Feb 9 18:32:29.887: ISDN BR0/1/1 **ERROR**: host_disconnect_ack: Call rejected cause Unallocated/unassigned number(0x1) call id 0x8005

Feb 9 18:32:39.999: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2

inbound i get this

eb 9 18:34:32.579: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x24

Sending Complete

Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3

Standard = CCITT

Transfer Capability = Speech

Transfer Mode = Circuit

Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s

Channel ID i = 0x81

Preferred, B1

Calling Party Number i = 0x2183, '625030456'

Plan:ISDN, Type:National

Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '493440075'

Plan:ISDN, Type:National

Feb 9 18:34:32.591: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0xA4

Channel ID i = 0x89

Exclusive, B1

Feb 9 18:34:32.607: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0xA4

Cause i = 0x8081 - Unallocated/unassigned number

Feb 9 18:34:32.983: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x24

Cause i = 0x8081 - Unallocated/unassigned number

Feb 9 18:34:32.983: ISDN BR0/1/1 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0xA4

Paolo Bevilacqua Sat, 02/09/2008 - 10:40

Hi, outbound you are calling:

90492540770

What is the correct number ? check destionan-pattern and digit strip

Inbound, if you have did, you need a translation-rule or dialplan pattern command. If you don't have did, place a translation-profile to translate to the number you want, uner trunk group.

hotrot_net Sat, 02/09/2008 - 10:47

so its working both inbound and outboud now??

i did reload it did not set up any dialplan pattern or DID yet .

you might noticed that i'm novice at the UC520 this is the first one I palced at a client. wont be the last..!! DO

Paolo Bevilacqua Sat, 02/09/2008 - 10:49

Yes it is. Look at the trace it's easy to read. You just need to get the numbers right now.

Actions

This Discussion