I have a 3750 CE device connecting to an FE port on a 6509 PE over a 10M WAN Link. Sub-interfaces are using to differentiate the traffic.
Configuration of the C3750:
interface FastEthernet 1/0/1.100
encapsulation dot1q 100
ip address 10.0.100.2 255.255.255.252
ip vrf forwarding VRF-100
!
interface FastEthernet 1/0/1.101
encapsulation dot1q 101
ip address 10.0.101.2 255.255.255.252
ip vrf forwarding VRF-101
!
interface vlan 10
ip address 10.100.0.1 255.255.255.0
ip vrf forwarding VRF-100
!
interface vlan 20
ip address 10.101.0.1 255.255.255.0
ip vrf forwarding VRF-101
Configuration of the C6509:
interface FastEthernet 5/1
no ip address
speed 10
duplex full
!
interface FastEthernet 5/1.100
encapsulation dot1q 100
ip address 10.0.100.1 255.255.255.252
ip vrf forwarding VRF-100
!
interface FastEthernet 5/1.101
encapsulation dot1q 101
ip address 10.0.101.2 255.255.255.252
ip vrf forwarding VRF-101
If I require a traffic class to be guaranteed a minimum bandwidth of 5 Mbps within VRF-100, where should the service policy be applied? Can a hierarchical policy be applied to the subinterfaces to achieve the desired result? Can shapers be applied in a similar manner?