The following snippet is taken from the following link:
"When a flow matches a permit ACL entry,
the associated action is taken and the flow is not checked against the remaining sequences. When a flow
matches a deny ACL entry, it will be checked against the next ACL in the same sequence or the next sequence."
I am not convinced about the above statement:
If I create the following vacl
vlan access-map block-aspire 10
match ip address ipexpert
vlan access-map block-aspire 20
vlan filter block-aspire vlan-list 55
ip access-list extended ipexpert
permit ip host 172.16.1.254 host 172.16.1.253
Here, I have a 'permit' access-list entry and the action performed is to successfully drop packets between the hosts 172.16.1.254 and 172.16.1.253 and to forward other packets for vlan 55.
If I change seq no 20 to 'drop' then I can see that this action is being taken since no hosts in vlan 55 can ping each other.
This appears contrary to the cisco link.
Can someone please verify ?
PS: I am using 2x3550's not 6500's as in the Cisco link.