02-22-2008 08:01 AM - edited 03-05-2019 09:18 PM
Is there a need to use spanning-tree backbonefast on core switches when using rapid-pvst+?
Is there a need to use spanning-tree uplinkfast on access switches while running rapid-pvst+?
02-22-2008 09:32 AM
If you use rapid-pvst+, backbonefast and uplinkfast are already enabled by default, so you dont have a choice.
HTH
Victor
02-22-2008 09:55 AM
The equivalent functionality of backbone fast and uplinkfast are built in RSTP and MST. It's not exactly similar in the way that there is no need for RLQs for backbone fast (RSTP/MST are actually much more efficient than backbone fast!).
Both backbonefast and uplinkfast CLI have no effect in RSTP/MST modes. Actually, uplinkfast still has an effect, it increases the port and bridge priorities in order to lower the chances of the bridge to be root and have designated ports. The idea being that a customer transitioning from stp to rstp should keep the same final topology.
Regards,
Francois
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: