cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
310
Views
2
Helpful
1
Replies

Redundant Tunnels

pprue
Level 1
Level 1

I would like if possible to configure this scenerio.

I have remote sites with PIX 506 s connecting to a cisco 2801 router with VPN AIM. This is working correctly. Now i have also a second 2801 for redundancy purposes. If i set the pix up with a second peer address of the 2801 #2 ISAKMP phase 1 completes successfully and i get 2 tunnels formed on the PIX . However a proper ipsec sa does not get generated for the second connection.

What i would like is to essentially load balance the traffic across the 2 vpn routers from the pix. I can accomplish this without a problem from the router side using equal cost routing but on the pix only one of them is allowed to be active at a time in an ipsec sa standpoint.

Is there something i am missing or is it not possible

1 Reply 1

ivillegas
Level 6
Level 6

I think this is possible as PIX can also exchange routes with dynamic protocols like OSPF.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card