cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
898
Views
3
Helpful
5
Replies

multicast BGP

Hi everybody,

I'm trying to configure the multicusting over mBGP and found that there are two possibilities to do it:

1. use the "address family ipv4 multicast"

2 use the "neighbor x.x.x.x nlri multicast"

is there any difference between those aproaches? I mean the difference in end-result of course :).

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

mohammedmahmoud
Level 11
Level 11

Hi,

Never tried the NLRI format, but the AFI (Address Family Identifier) format was introduced with multiprotocol BGP (mBGP) in Cisco IOS Release 12.0(2)S and Cisco IOS Release 11.1(20)CC and integrated into Cisco IOS Release 12.0(7)T. The AFI format is designed to be modular, scalable, and support multiple AFI and subsequent address-family identifier (SAFI) configurations, please check the below link:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/ftbhycli.html

BR,

Mohammed Mahmoud.

View solution in original post

5 Replies 5

mohammedmahmoud
Level 11
Level 11

Hi,

Never tried the NLRI format, but the AFI (Address Family Identifier) format was introduced with multiprotocol BGP (mBGP) in Cisco IOS Release 12.0(2)S and Cisco IOS Release 11.1(20)CC and integrated into Cisco IOS Release 12.0(7)T. The AFI format is designed to be modular, scalable, and support multiple AFI and subsequent address-family identifier (SAFI) configurations, please check the below link:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/ftbhycli.html

BR,

Mohammed Mahmoud.

yes, it's all correct, but I'd like to now if there are any differences in multicast traffic flow or routing table between them.

if you search for something like "multicast BGP" on cisco.com you will find a lot of exaples which use "nlri" option to activate multicast.

Hi,

The difference is just in the configuration and the way BGP is going to exchange the information, with AFI the routing information is carried as appended attributes (multi protocol extensions), NLRI format has many drawbacks as many new features are supported only in AFI and SAFI configuration modes and cannot be configured in NLRI configuration modes, i quote from the above document regarding NLRI limitations:

"Limited support for multicast interdomain routing and incongruent multicast and unicast topologies. In the NLRI format, not all configuration options are available, and these configuration are more complex. If the routers in the infrastructure do not have multicast capabilities, or if policies differ as to where multicast traffic is configured to flow, multicast routing cannot be supported."

BR,

Mohammed Mahmoud.

ok, thank you, it's more clear then.

I was just curious that that are so many multicast BGP examples with nlri option and very few with address-family.

hi,

You are very welcomed, and if you are interested in more details, you can check the Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 RFC 2858:

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2858.txt

BR,

Mohammed Mahmoud.

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card