Policy based routing and Floating routes

Answered Question
Apr 9th, 2008
User Badges:


I have following configurations in one router and i am not been able to fetch the details thay y are they used. kindly suggest me some link or info regarding this


rtr 1

type echo protocol ipicmpecho 192.168.52.34

!

rtr schedule 1 life forever start-time now

!

track 192 rtr 1 reachability

!

int x

ip policy route-map ABC_MAP

!

route-map MIXIT_MAP

set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.52.34 10 track 192

!

ip route xx.xx.xx.241 255.255.255.255 192.168.52.34 track 192

ip route xx.xx.xx.241 255.255.255.255 ABC_INTERNET_INTERFACE 254



Correct Answer by sundar.palaniappan about 9 years 1 month ago

Yes, there's no drawback. As soon as 192.168.52.34 becomes reachable the primary route will be used.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
imranraheel Wed, 04/09/2008 - 10:37
User Badges:

Is there any draw back will I be able to get the route back if i will get the connectivity back to xx.xx.xx.241 via 192.168.52.34

Correct Answer
sundar.palaniappan Wed, 04/09/2008 - 10:48
User Badges:
  • Green, 3000 points or more

Yes, there's no drawback. As soon as 192.168.52.34 becomes reachable the primary route will be used.

imranraheel Tue, 04/15/2008 - 13:32
User Badges:

I am trying to implemet the following configurations



rtr 1

type echo protocol ipicmpecho 192.168.52.34

!

rtr schedule 1 life forever start-time now

!

track 192 rtr 1 reachability

!

int x

ip policy route-map ABC_MAP

!

route-map ABC_MAP

set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.52.34 10 track 192

!

ip route xx.xx.xx.241 255.255.255.255 192.168.52.34 track 192

ip route xx.xx.xx.241 255.255.255.255 xx.xx.xx.2 254


But when ever i try this i receive an error (command support issues)on verify-availability

I am using 3550 with (C3550-IPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(35)SE IOS.


Kindly put some light on this



Actions

This Discussion