eBGP square or triangle?

Unanswered Question
Apr 17th, 2008

Hi,


Hopefully a simple eBGP question:


If I have 2 edge routers in an AS, and 2 edge routers in another AS is it best practices to have them in a square, or triangles?


By this I mean AS1 has router 1 and router 2 (running iBGP between them), and AS 2 has the same.


Is it best practice to have an eBGP peer between AS1 router 1 <-> AS2 router 1, and AS1 router 2 <-> AS2 router 2, or:


AS1 router 1 peering with AS2 router 1 and 2, and AS1 router 2 peering with AS2 router 1 and 2.


Either way, can somebody confirm the best practice and why?


Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
cisco_lad2004 Fri, 04/18/2008 - 10:50

Andy


if layer ONE allows for redundancy, meaning R1-AS1 has 2 different links to R1&R2-AS2 then I would fully mesh.

if not, there are still some benefits.

I would set up 3 session on each router.

in this case traffic outboud, would always exit via external AS. so R1-AS1 >> R1 or R2 -AS2 (Unless u have manipulated IBGP attributes).

why would I fully mesh ?

1-Redundancy.

2-less hops, by meshing. u are allowing BGP to use less hops which sometimes customers like to see (unless MPLS is used)


HTH


Sam

andy.taylor Fri, 04/18/2008 - 13:38

Sam,


Many thanks. I deployed with multiple eEBP peers i.e. each router has 2 x eBGP and 1 x iBGP for redundancy and found faster convergence.


Many thanks for your reply, it's good to get validation :-)


All the very best,


Andy

Actions

This Discussion