6500 and ospf

Unanswered Question
May 16th, 2008
User Badges:

Good morning,

I have a problem with ospf.

I have 2 6500 in hsrp and fwsm in failover. OSPF is enabled on both 6500. 6500 receive routes from fwsm with ospf. Fwsm has some static routes. Only one of the 2 6500 shows these routes when I write sh ip route. There are not any problems with routes announced by routers which are in a vlan of fwsm. In running config, there are not differences about ospf process.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Richard Burts Fri, 05/16/2008 - 05:51
User Badges:
  • Super Silver, 17500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

I am not sure what the issue here is. Perhaps if you post the config from both 6500 and post the output of show ip route from both 6500 then perhaps we can see what the issue is.


HTH


Rick

gdspa Fri, 05/16/2008 - 07:01
User Badges:

I send you the output of sh ip route.

On 6500_1 I have

S 10.2.0.0/16 [1/0] via 10.x.x.x

S 10.1.0.0/16 [1/0] via 10.x.x.x

O E2 10.3.0.0/16 [110/1] via 10.x.x.x, 01:43:36, VlanY

On 6500_2 I have

O E2 10.1.0.0/16 [110/20] via 10.x.x.x, 01:46:18, VlanY

O E2 10.2.0.0/16 [110/20] via 10.x.x.x, 01:46:18, VlanY

O E2 10.3.0.0/16 [95/537600] via 10.x.x.x, 6d22h, VlanY

If I don't insert the 2 static routes, 6500_1 doesn't know how to route packets directed to 10.1.0.0 or 10.2.0.0. My question is: why 6500_1 doesn't learn routes from fwsm?(there are 2 static routes on fwsm for 10.1.0.0 and 10.2.0.0). Route for 10.3.0.0 is announced by a router on a vlan of fwsm.

sdoremus33 Fri, 05/16/2008 - 09:41
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

What is your output when you do the following

sh ip ospf route

sh ip ospf data

sho ip ospf route | i 10.0.0.0


Actions

This Discussion