05-16-2008 05:34 AM - edited 03-05-2019 11:02 PM
Good morning,
I have a problem with ospf.
I have 2 6500 in hsrp and fwsm in failover. OSPF is enabled on both 6500. 6500 receive routes from fwsm with ospf. Fwsm has some static routes. Only one of the 2 6500 shows these routes when I write sh ip route. There are not any problems with routes announced by routers which are in a vlan of fwsm. In running config, there are not differences about ospf process.
05-16-2008 05:51 AM
I am not sure what the issue here is. Perhaps if you post the config from both 6500 and post the output of show ip route from both 6500 then perhaps we can see what the issue is.
HTH
Rick
05-16-2008 07:01 AM
I send you the output of sh ip route.
On 6500_1 I have
S 10.2.0.0/16 [1/0] via 10.x.x.x
S 10.1.0.0/16 [1/0] via 10.x.x.x
O E2 10.3.0.0/16 [110/1] via 10.x.x.x, 01:43:36, VlanY
On 6500_2 I have
O E2 10.1.0.0/16 [110/20] via 10.x.x.x, 01:46:18, VlanY
O E2 10.2.0.0/16 [110/20] via 10.x.x.x, 01:46:18, VlanY
O E2 10.3.0.0/16 [95/537600] via 10.x.x.x, 6d22h, VlanY
If I don't insert the 2 static routes, 6500_1 doesn't know how to route packets directed to 10.1.0.0 or 10.2.0.0. My question is: why 6500_1 doesn't learn routes from fwsm?(there are 2 static routes on fwsm for 10.1.0.0 and 10.2.0.0). Route for 10.3.0.0 is announced by a router on a vlan of fwsm.
05-16-2008 09:41 AM
What is your output when you do the following
sh ip ospf route
sh ip ospf data
sho ip ospf route | i 10.0.0.0
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: