Thanks a lot for the reply, I have read these document but In out case we dont want both sites to talk with each other.. we need to configure Pt to Pt tunnels from HQ.

** Should I have to creat GRE over IPSec Tunnels between the "Tunnel Interfaces" or "Serial Interfaces" or ethrnet to ethrnet .. because in my situation I want creat 2 Tunnels from my HQ ethernet to the both Sites's Routers internal Ethernet.

Is It possible.... or what is the best solution in my case

Thanking you in anticipation,

Shahid

If you want two have to seperate interfaces then you can just use regular GRE over ISPEC. There is no need for the MGRE/DMVPN complexitiy.

Just create two seperate tunnel interfaces on the hub HQ router. Also if you don't need any dynamic routing, you can just have two p2p 'direct encapsulation' IPSEC tunnels (as in IPSEC tunnels without GRE).

Regards

Farrukh

Thanks Furrukh,

In my case I am using a MPLS base OSPF Network and these 2 link will merge in it using OSPF, so I have configure PtP tunnels to both sites from HQ, one tunnel is working very fine.. but other tunnel is always MM_No_STATE..etc, Its not showing any adjancy from HQ, I am attching the files I do hope you will be able to diagnose the Issue.....

Regards,

Shahid

Thanks a lot Furrukh... I do hope its gonna work.... Great Help...

I am working in BAE Syetems in Riyadh,I am really thankful for your time and support.

Regards

Shahid

premaximus@yahoo.co.uk

Thats very nice to know Shahid :) I wish you good luck with your job. You can see where I work from my profile on NETPRO.

Let me know if this solution works out. And also rate helpful posts :)

Regards

Farrukh

Hi Mr. Furrukh,

I have been asking about this issue from last week but nobody from the forum replied accuratly :)

I am looking for a solution where I can connect local LAN user using WIFI and connect then Using 3G GSM connection to the internet using CISCO Router.

so I need Wifi (WLAN) 3G GSM (WWAN) together so what you will suggest me to slect as a Router + Modules which can best fit in my requirment..

What would be the best solution... 1841 or 1861 series or ???

Many Thanks

Shahid

Dear Shahid

The best option would be to contact the local Cisco team (your account manager).

Cisco has a pretty strong team here in Saudi.

Regards

Farrukh

Hi Furrukh,

May I please have your email address, Its very Important..

Regards,

Shahid

Give me yours and I'll contact you : )

No problem, here we go...

shahidsattar@msn.com

s.rana@ise-ltd.com

0553032043

Thanks,

Shahid