Port busyout

Unanswered Question
Jun 11th, 2008

Hi forum,

I have a 2800 running Version 12.4(11)T3, recently we added another T1 card connected to our PABX.

I have this configuration:

card type t1 0 3

network-clock-participate wic 1

network-clock-participate wic 3

network-clock-select 1 T1 0/1/0

network-clock-select 2 T1 0/3/0

network-clock-select 3 T1 0/3/1

controller T1 0/1/0

framing sf

linecode b8zs

ds0-group 1 timeslots 1-24 type e&m-immediate-start

!

controller T1 0/3/0

framing sf

linecode b8zs

ds0-group 1 timeslots 1-24 type e&m-immediate-start

!

controller T1 0/3/1

framing sf

linecode b8zs

ds0-group 1 timeslots 1-24 type e&m-immediate-start

However, i notice that on the newly added card port 0/3/1:1.1, the port shown that it is busyout, what could be the cause of this?

any pointers will be very much appreciated.

--------------------------

0/3/0:1.21 - - - EM_ONHOOK

0/3/0:1.22 - - - EM_ONHOOK

0/3/0:1.23 - - - EM_ONHOOK

0/3/0:1.24 - - - EM_ONHOOK

0/3/1:1.1 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.2 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.3 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.4 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.5 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.6 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.7 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.8 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

0/3/1:1.9 - - - EM_BUSYOUT

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.

I just want to warn you that I had opened about 3 cases with Cisco TAC regarding this issue and they suggested I upgrade to the latest IOS, Well, I did and still the same thing.

You can sometimes try to reset the gateway associated with the FXS port you are using and sometimes that will fix it. The other work around is to reload the router. I thought originally that it was an issue with Call Manager, but it is on the router. I am not sure if it is a IOS bug or an issue with the card. Maybe they all do that because I have two that do the same thing. I usually always check them to be sure.

if you find the fix, let me know. I am still looking.

paulnigel Wed, 06/18/2008 - 18:27

Hi julio, bevilacqua,

Thanks for the advice, append is my show ver:

Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ENTSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(11)T3

RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc4)

Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

Copyright (c) 1986-2007 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

Compiled Wed 11-Jul-07 16:48 by prod_rel_team

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.3(8r)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

System returned to ROM by reload at 15:04:43 MAL Sat Jun 7 2008

System image file is "flash:c2800nm-entservicesk9-mz.124-11.T3.bin"

================================

can i say the controller T1 0/3/0 will not be able to process any call?

thanks much,

paulnigel Wed, 08/13/2008 - 16:18

Hi,

We upgrade to this version :

Cisco IOS Software, 2800 Software (C2800NM-ENTSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(19b),

RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

Compiled Fri 13-Jun-08 04:12 by prod_rel_team

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.3(8r)T7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

SJ2-C2811 uptime is 5 weeks, 6 days, 10 hours, 23 minutes

System returned to ROM by power-on

System restarted at 06:53:00 PDT Thu Jul 3 2008

System image file is "flash:c2800nm-entservicesk9-mz.124-19b.bin"

But I am still seeing this :

0/0/1:1 5 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

0/0/1:1 6 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

0/0/1:1 7 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

0/0/1:1 8 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

0/0/1:1 9 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

0/0/1:1 10 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

0/0/1:1 11 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

0/0/1:1 12 - - - vpm level 1 state = EM_BUSYOUT

vpm level 0 state = S_UP

Is this ok?

Actions

This Discussion