I'm trying to configure NAT on a stick just as a learning exercise in my home network. I followed the instructions on Cisco's website (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094430.shtml)and also an article on techrepublic (http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/networking/?p=486) that showed how to configure nat on a stick.
My setup is as follows
68.33.x.x IP address
The netgear's gateway is 192.168.0.1 and it leases 192.168.0.10 to one computer on my home network
Right now, I have a hub connected between the Netgear router, the Cisco 2610, and the Windows PC that I will use to get on the internet. The Netgear router hooks into the uplink port on the Hub. The Cisco, and the PC all hook into 2 of the other ports.
The first question I have is whether or not it is better to have a switch or a hub in order to make this work? I know all of the advantages of using a switch but the techrepublic article specifically mentioned using a hub. Is there a reason or will either one work for this type of setup?
I'm trying to configure in a similar fashion as to what both articles said.
Here is my setup
ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip policy route-map Nat-loop
ip nat pool external 192.168.0.10 192.168.0.10 prefix-length 29
ip nat inside source list 10 pool external overload
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 Ethernet0/0
access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 102 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 102 permit ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
route-map Nat-loop permit 10
match ip address 102
set ip next-hop 10.0.1.2
My router isn't able to connect to anything outside of the local network. Even doing a traceroute to an external IP is not working?