Hi,
I'm trying to configure NAT on a stick just as a learning exercise in my home network. I followed the instructions on Cisco's website (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094430.shtml)and also an article on techrepublic (http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/networking/?p=486) that showed how to configure nat on a stick.
My setup is as follows
Comcast Connection
68.33.x.x IP address
to
Netgear Router
The netgear's gateway is 192.168.0.1 and it leases 192.168.0.10 to one computer on my home network
Right now, I have a hub connected between the Netgear router, the Cisco 2610, and the Windows PC that I will use to get on the internet. The Netgear router hooks into the uplink port on the Hub. The Cisco, and the PC all hook into 2 of the other ports.
The first question I have is whether or not it is better to have a switch or a hub in order to make this work? I know all of the advantages of using a switch but the techrepublic article specifically mentioned using a hub. Is there a reason or will either one work for this type of setup?
I'm trying to configure in a similar fashion as to what both articles said.
Here is my setup
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip policy route-map Nat-loop
half-duplex
!
ip nat pool external 192.168.0.10 192.168.0.10 prefix-length 29
ip nat inside source list 10 pool external overload
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 Ethernet0/0
access-list 10 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 102 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 102 permit ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
route-map Nat-loop permit 10
match ip address 102
set ip next-hop 10.0.1.2
My router isn't able to connect to anything outside of the local network. Even doing a traceroute to an external IP is not working?
Please advise
