We are providing an entirely new subnet
for our video conf. equipment.
The engineers have added a 172.20.255.x network for video conf. but have configured the router the following way.
description to LAN
ip address 172.20.255.34 255.255.255.248 secondary
ip address 192.168.92.251 255.255.255.0
standby 1 ip 192.168.92.1
standby 1 ip 172.20.255.33 secondary
standby 1 preempt
With 192.168.92.x being the local lan
and 172.20.255.x being the video conf.
My question is this
Would it have been better to configure the router interfaces with sub interfaces
instead of using secondary ip's?
Also..do the switches still need vlans
configured with the current configurations..
or will vlan 1 suffice