Ok, thank you. All of the traffic is properly marked by the time it gets to the one armed router. So it sounds like I only need the outbound service policy attached to the sub-interfaces, if I understand you correctly.

As far as the percentages go, would specifying the data rate be a better way to go?

Thanks again!

Hello Matthew,

you can use the percentages if you like but you need to resize the bandwidth under each subif using bandwidth command.

So for two subifs

bandwith 50000

under each subif

and so on

Otherwise you can use data rates.

I would use policy-maps with different names in order to simplify monitoring.

You can use sh policy-map int fas0/1.x to see what is happening on each subif but using a different name for each service-policy even if their config is the same is better.

Hope to help

Giuseppe

[Please Rate if Helps, thanks]

I tried to apply the policy to the 1st sub-interface and received an error message of: CBWFQ : Not supported on subinterfaces

If I apply it to fa0/1, it takes. Anybody know if this will work, otherwise I'll try it in the lab tomorrow.

Thanks!

I found an article that applies to this situation: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a0080114326.shtml

fyi: I've had success with the procedures you found in your reference.

Hello Matthew,

it should work.

Support on subif is actually platform dependent : high end router allows to do it.

In this case all the questions about bandwidth are not a concern here.

To keep trace of traffic on single subinterfaces you should consider to use an output acl that will count packets on each class

Hope to help

Giuseppe