08-28-2008 09:21 AM - edited 03-06-2019 01:03 AM
Hi there,
I have a Cisco 3020 bladeswitch that is only reporting interface bandwidth of 10000Kbit when the link is actually a gigabit interface:
GigabitEthernet0/9 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 001b.0c06.4909 (bia 001b.0c06.4909)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 21/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Auto-duplex, Auto-speed, link type is auto, media type is 1000BaseX
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:29:44
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 844000 bits/sec, 54 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 13000 bits/sec, 37 packets/sec
179197 packets input, 243202451 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 42 broadcasts (0 multicast)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 0 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
134878 packets output, 9565053 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Here's the interface configuration:
Current configuration : 60 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/9
spanning-tree portfast
end
I've tried having both sides as Auto, and both sides set manually, with no luck. Has anyone seen this issue before? Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-28-2008 09:49 AM
If you are running 12.2(25)SEF2, There is an internal cosmetic bug for that. It is first fixed in 12.2(35)SE.
08-28-2008 09:49 AM
If you are running 12.2(25)SEF2, There is an internal cosmetic bug for that. It is first fixed in 12.2(35)SE.
08-28-2008 10:05 AM
Thanks for the reply. So, being cosmetic, does that mean it doesn't actually affect the speed of the interface?
08-28-2008 10:11 AM
That is correct, it is only cosmetic and won't affect the actual speed of the interface. If you use monitoring tools then you will have problems with the reports and interfaces capabilities...
09-09-2009 06:44 AM
Please can you post the bug details here for ref ? I cannot find any reference in release notes or bug toolkit etc.
09-09-2009 08:09 AM
You won't be able to find it because it is an internal bug and pretty much all we can see is:
CBS3020: show int CMD shows incorrect BW, DLY info on internal ports
1st Found-In
12.2(25)SEF2
Fixed-In
12.2(35)SE
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide