09-10-2008 11:01 AM - edited 03-15-2019 01:11 PM
I am getting random busy signals which I believe is related to a 'glare' condition where the router tries to use the same channel. I have found that you should order the PBX and VoIP peer opposite (top down and bottom up) but I have not found how to actually do this.
The error I get is:
*Sep 10 18:36:19.491: //2848/2F75B4C39568/CCAPI/cc_api_call_disconnected:
Cause Value=44, Interface=0x4762E32C, Call Id=2848
*Sep 10 18:36:19.491: //2848/2F75B4C39568/CCAPI/cc_api_call_disconnected:
Call Entry(Responsed=TRUE, Cause Value=44, Retry Count=0)
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-12-2008 02:00 PM
It'll make my day, if it does resolve :-). Thanks for the update.
Regards,
Michael.
09-10-2008 11:09 AM
Hello Bill
Under the D channel interface (serial x/x/x:23) try the following:
isdn bchan-number-order [ascending | descending]
Hope that helped, if so please rate.
09-10-2008 11:29 AM
If this is a T1 CAS circuit, the issue might be caused if the time it takes for a wink to come back to the router after seizure is different from the wink duration timer.
If this is the case, the use of the 'timing wink-duration receive
Regards,
Michael.
09-10-2008 11:55 AM
It is a PBX that is linking into the router, and the router is handling site-to-site calls. The busy signal is happening from a call destined for the second site (VoIP peer on the dial plan).
Here is the hardware:
sh inv
NAME: "2811 chassis", DESCR: "2811 chassis"
PID: CISCO2811 , VID: V01 , SN: x
NAME: "Two port T1 voice interface daughtercard with Drop and Insert on Slot 0 SubSlot 1", DESCR: "Two port T1 voice interface daughtercard with Drop and Insert"
PID: VWIC-2MFT-T1-DI= , VID: 1.0, SN: x
NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP on Slot 0 SubSlot 4", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP"
PID: PVDM2-16 , VID: NA , SN: x
I'll post the full vpm & vtsp output as soon as I can capture an issue.
09-10-2008 12:10 PM
09-12-2008 11:42 AM
I think this may have done the trick ... I set the wink-d value to 250 to start, and everything broke, so I went down a bit to 180 and everything seems to be stable now. Submit one more reply if you can so that I can give you credit for 'resolving' the issue if everything holds.
09-12-2008 02:00 PM
It'll make my day, if it does resolve :-). Thanks for the update.
Regards,
Michael.
09-16-2008 01:19 PM
consider your day made!
Thanks again, 2 days and no problems reported.
09-16-2008 01:32 PM
Excellent. Here's to a glare-free circuit! Thanks for the update, Bill, and the opportunity to assist.
Regards,
Michael.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: