cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
542
Views
0
Helpful
4
Replies

Multilink PPP NxT1 vs Fractional DS3

rkeough
Level 1
Level 1

I am trying to determine which technology to go with so I am trying to determine if there is any significant overhead associated with MLPPP or any other benefits to a Fractional DS3 circuit.

4 Replies 4

shillyar
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

I dont think the overhead is really an issue. I would say proably the higher the cost of a fraction ds3 would be the bigger issue.

Thx Steve

Steve, Thanks for the reply. I guess I am wondering just how much overhead there might be. There is a breakeven in cost between NxT1 and DS3 I guess I am trying to factor in any overhead that would also be factored in.

I have a troubleshooting question I have a Single T1 in a Bundle that will not go active the interface ser0/1/1:0 is Up down

I can not seem to get the Telco to believe it is his fault. I need a good document on troubleshooting and debugging the PPP Multilink. this is what it does shen I do a no shut on the interface

VA_VaBeach_3637SentaraWay#

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 PPP: Using default call direction

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 PPP: Treating connection as a dedicated line

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 PPP: Session handle[B3000069] Session id[121]

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 122 len 33

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x4CE33619 (0x05064CE33619)

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: MRRU 1500 (0x110405DC)

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 p1551291-1684241

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: (0x13130170313535313239312D31363834)

.Sep 15 16:23:26: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: (0x323431)

VA_VaBeach_3637SentaraWay#

.Sep 15 16:23:28: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: Timeout: State REQsent

.Sep 15 16:23:28: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: O CONFREQ [REQsent] id 123 len 33

.Sep 15 16:23:28: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x4CE33619 (0x05064CE33619)

.Sep 15 16:23:28: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: MRRU 1500 (0x110405DC)

.Sep 15 16:23:28: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: EndpointDisc 1 p1551291-1684241

.Sep 15 16:23:28: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: (0x13130170313535313239312D31363834)

.Sep 15 16:23:28: Se0/1/1:0 LCP: (0x323431)

The EndpointDisc matches the configured PAP I am telling telco they are not sending.

shillyar
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hello,

I found this for a DS3

Line rate: 44,736,000 b/s

Signals: 7 DS2 signals = 28 DS1 signals

Overhead bits:

56 bits total/frame

F-bits (framing) 28 bits/

M-bits (multiframing) 3 bits/

C-bits (stuffing) 21 bits

X-bits (message) 2 bits/

P-bits (parity) 2 bits/

Data bits between overhead bits 84

so the over head appears to be very low. So the over head on the MLPP would vary a bit depending on how many and what your multilinking together.

Again the cost would proably be the big deciding factor is there is a big difference in price but, the speeds/through puts would be very similiar if your comparing apples to apples.

Thx

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card