Call Manager Express - SIP Question

Unanswered Question
Sep 24th, 2008

I have to put a third Party SIP phone working with CME 7. This Special Phone is an Innovaphone IP150. Which support this features:

SIP: SIP version 2 (including HTTP digest authentication) conform RFC 3261

SIP over UDP, TCP, TLS (SIPS, V 7.0 or higher)

SIP services: MWI (rfc3842/rfc3265 "Subscription for message-summary")

DTMF (rfc2833 "RTP payload for DTMF")

Name Identification (Display String, rfc3325 "Asserted Identity")

Hold/Retrieve (rfc3264 "Offer/Answer Model for SDP")

Transfer (rfc3515 "REFER Method", rfc3891 "Replaces Header)

Coder Change, T.38 (rfc3264 "Re-Negotiation")

Call Forwarding (PBX internal, "183 Call Is Being Forwarded", "Diversion Header")

Overlap Dialing (rfc3578)

Dialoge State monitoring, partner Key (rfc 4235)

Instant Messaging (rfc 3428)

Can anyone tell me if this works with CME 7 or where can I find the information.

Thanks a lot

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
castro.nuno Wed, 09/24/2008 - 09:56

sorry is not working but to Work, here is the question again.

I have to put a third Party SIP phone to work with CME 7. This Special Phone is an Innovaphone IP150. Which support this features:

SIP: SIP version 2 (including HTTP digest authentication) conform RFC 3261

SIP over UDP, TCP, TLS (SIPS, V 7.0 or higher)

SIP services: MWI (rfc3842/rfc3265 "Subscription for message-summary")

DTMF (rfc2833 "RTP payload for DTMF")

Name Identification (Display String, rfc3325 "Asserted Identity")

Hold/Retrieve (rfc3264 "Offer/Answer Model for SDP")

Transfer (rfc3515 "REFER Method", rfc3891 "Replaces Header)

Coder Change, T.38 (rfc3264 "Re-Negotiation")

Call Forwarding (PBX internal, "183 Call Is Being Forwarded", "Diversion Header")

Overlap Dialing (rfc3578)

Dialoge State monitoring, partner Key (rfc 4235)

Instant Messaging (rfc 3428)

Can anyone tell me if this works with CME 7 or where can I find the information.

Thanks a lot

Actions

This Discussion