Ethernet interface redundancy

Answered Question
Oct 9th, 2008
User Badges:

Hi,

Is it possible to use HSRP/VRRP internal one router if you want to have redundancy between two interfaces?

Our customer has router with two Ethernet interfaces.

This two interfaces are connected to two switches, there is also cross cable between the switches.

On the other side of the switches there are two other routers connected.

The customer will not use any routing protocols to get redundancy between the standalone router and the two separated routers.


Need some ideas how we can solved this.


//Niklas

Correct Answer by Giuseppe Larosa about 8 years 8 months ago

Hello Niklas,

you can use IRB integrated routing and bridging: HSRP will not work as well explained by Jon.


bridge 1 protocol ieee

bridge 1 route ip

bridge 1 bridge ip


int eth0

no ip addr

bridge-group 1


int eth1

no ip addr

bridge-group 1


int bv1

ip address x.x.x.x

! this the layer3 interface


be aware that STP will block one link but it will be ready to be used if the first fails


you can uses static routes with IP next hops the ip addresses of the VIP of the HSRP made on the other two routers (on them you can they are two different boxes)


the other two routers will have static routes to the BVI ip address as next hop


be aware that until a router has an ARP entry for the ip next hop and its own interface is up the static route is considered valid



Hope to help

Giuseppe


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Jon Marshall Thu, 10/09/2008 - 09:27
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

HSRP will not work because you cannot assign 2 IP addresses out of the same subnet on 2 ethernet interfaces on the same router.


What type of redundancy are you looking for. If you cannot use routing protocols you could look into floating statics but it's very difficult to be more precise without more details.


Jon

yahoo2006 Thu, 10/09/2008 - 11:09
User Badges:

yes.

I think the best solution is to use floating static route

for example:

x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 Fe1

x.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 Fe2 10

Correct Answer
Giuseppe Larosa Thu, 10/09/2008 - 12:32
User Badges:
  • Super Silver, 17500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

Hello Niklas,

you can use IRB integrated routing and bridging: HSRP will not work as well explained by Jon.


bridge 1 protocol ieee

bridge 1 route ip

bridge 1 bridge ip


int eth0

no ip addr

bridge-group 1


int eth1

no ip addr

bridge-group 1


int bv1

ip address x.x.x.x

! this the layer3 interface


be aware that STP will block one link but it will be ready to be used if the first fails


you can uses static routes with IP next hops the ip addresses of the VIP of the HSRP made on the other two routers (on them you can they are two different boxes)


the other two routers will have static routes to the BVI ip address as next hop


be aware that until a router has an ARP entry for the ip next hop and its own interface is up the static route is considered valid



Hope to help

Giuseppe


Actions

This Discussion