cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
706
Views
0
Helpful
1
Replies

Neighbor ebgp-multihop

Wassim Aouadi
Level 4
Level 4

hi,

Suppose I have two EBGP routers with loopback interfaces each. On each router, I'm setting "neighbor xxxx ebgp-multihop 2".

What if I put 3 or 4 instead of 2? will it affect the BGP neighbor establishment?

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello Wassim,

>> What if I put 3 or 4 instead of 2? will it affect the BGP neighbor establishment?

the eBGP session will be established but what changes is that the eBGP session could be able to stay up even if the direct link between the two routers is down if the topology provide an alternate path via another node.

So for example a BGP conditional advertisement is not triggered or you can face security problems.

Once I used for some years 3 for eBGP session between loopbacks. Then in developing an MPLS VPN service in a VRF site using one CE and two PE I saw the session PE1-CE still up after having disabled the link PE1-CE and by reducing from 3 to 2 I've corrected the behaviour.

The two PE routers had a direct MPLS link (backbone LAN) so that 3 was enough to have the eBGP session still up but BGP packets and user traffic were using the link PE2-CE

Hope to help

Giuseppe

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello Wassim,

>> What if I put 3 or 4 instead of 2? will it affect the BGP neighbor establishment?

the eBGP session will be established but what changes is that the eBGP session could be able to stay up even if the direct link between the two routers is down if the topology provide an alternate path via another node.

So for example a BGP conditional advertisement is not triggered or you can face security problems.

Once I used for some years 3 for eBGP session between loopbacks. Then in developing an MPLS VPN service in a VRF site using one CE and two PE I saw the session PE1-CE still up after having disabled the link PE1-CE and by reducing from 3 to 2 I've corrected the behaviour.

The two PE routers had a direct MPLS link (backbone LAN) so that 3 was enough to have the eBGP session still up but BGP packets and user traffic were using the link PE2-CE

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card