11-07-2008 12:51 PM - edited 03-15-2019 02:25 PM
Our vendor has installed a Unified (with Exchange) Unity system with Failover. The system is a Unity release 7.x.
The vendor placed the two Unity servers (accessing a single Exchange message store) in two different geographically diverse locations.
At our main data center (where our Exchange system is located), they placed our primary Unity server. The Failover server is located about 20 miles away (connected via fiber). This second server is configured as a fail over (not distributed messaging) and is homed back to the one Exchange system.
The documentation (Cisco Unified Communications Solution Reference Network Design (SRND), chapter 13) seems to indicate that the primary and fail over Unity servers should be co-located.
Our vendor is Cisco Gold rated but I have to question this configuration. Is something new to Unity release 7.x that provides a reason for a remotely located fail over server?
Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-07-2008 01:01 PM
Make sure you meet the requirements outlined here:
Failover Requirements for Installing Cisco Unity Servers in Separate Buildings or Sites
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/7x/requirements/7xcusysreq.html#wp567423
otherwise we won't support your deployment
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
11-07-2008 01:01 PM
Make sure you meet the requirements outlined here:
Failover Requirements for Installing Cisco Unity Servers in Separate Buildings or Sites
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unity/7x/requirements/7xcusysreq.html#wp567423
otherwise we won't support your deployment
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
11-07-2008 01:25 PM
If you dont meet the failover requirements, take a look at the standby redundancy as an alternate solution, it's listed in the above provided doc.
Chris
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: