Different queueing strategy in ima-group

Unanswered Question
Nov 9th, 2008


We have 4 T1 circuits which are bundled into ATM/IMA group.

However, I found the guy set first two interfaces have weighted fair as the Queueing strategy, and last two have Per VC Queueing.

I think the grouped interfaces should have same queueing strategy, but I wonder what kind of problems will occur under my circumstance?

Does anyone have an idea?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
mohindersingh Tue, 11/11/2008 - 04:37

Hi Buddy,

I think you should be checking the queuing stratergy on the IMA interface not on physical interfaces.

if you have applied policy-map with CBWFQ on the IMA interface, it should be reflected on IMA interface, not on physical.



t-hata Tue, 11/11/2008 - 17:15

Hi Mahi,

Thanks for your reply. I confirmed the IMA interface set to Per VC queueing.

But it seemed any policy-map applied to it.

Does this queueing strategy on IMA interface override the queueing strategy on each physical interface?




This Discussion