11-09-2008 08:21 PM - edited 03-04-2019 12:15 AM
Hi,
We have 4 T1 circuits which are bundled into ATM/IMA group.
However, I found the guy set first two interfaces have weighted fair as the Queueing strategy, and last two have Per VC Queueing.
I think the grouped interfaces should have same queueing strategy, but I wonder what kind of problems will occur under my circumstance?
Does anyone have an idea?
11-11-2008 04:37 AM
Hi Buddy,
I think you should be checking the queuing stratergy on the IMA interface not on physical interfaces.
if you have applied policy-map with CBWFQ on the IMA interface, it should be reflected on IMA interface, not on physical.
Regards
Mahi
11-11-2008 05:15 PM
Hi Mahi,
Thanks for your reply. I confirmed the IMA interface set to Per VC queueing.
But it seemed any policy-map applied to it.
Does this queueing strategy on IMA interface override the queueing strategy on each physical interface?
Regards,
Hata
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide